For an intake team in Washington, a UnitedHealthcare card means Optum Behavioral Health’s national ABA criteria, the District’s habilitative-services mandate in D.C. Code § 31-3272, and the plan’s funding type. UnitedHealthcare is not one of the District’s Medicaid plans, so a UHC card here is commercial (or Medicare).
UnitedHealthcare administers ABA through Optum Behavioral Health under the ABA Supplemental Clinical Criteria (interim review April 2026): prior authorization, a diagnosis confirmed with a validated tool, direct case supervision of 1–2 hours per 10 hours of treatment, and continued-service review that looks hard at use below 80% of authorized hours. Optum’s ABA State Mandates supplement (effective July 2026) has entries for Arizona, California, Connecticut, Florida, Maryland, Massachusetts, Ohio, Pennsylvania and Virginia, plus New Jersey and New York Medicaid, but none for the District, so no DC-specific criteria modify the commercial policy. DHCF lists no UnitedHealthcare Medicaid plan in the District.[1][2][18]
The District’s autism coverage rule is a habilitative-services statute, not a stand-alone ABA law. D.C. Code § 31-3272 (D.C. Law 16-198, 2007) requires a health insurer to "Provide coverage of habilitative services for children under the age of 21 years and may do so through a managed care system." Section 31-3271 defines habilitative services as "services, including occupational therapy, physical therapy, and speech therapy, for the treatment of a child with a congenital or genetic birth defect to enhance the child’s ability to function," and says a congenital or genetic birth defect "includes: (A) Autism or an autism spectrum disorder." Denying a habilitative request because the condition is not a birth defect is, by statute, an adverse decision. The coverage "shall not be more restrictive than coverage provided for any other illness, condition, or disorder" for deductibles, durational or dollar limits, visit or treatment limits, and cost sharing. An insurer does not have to pay for habilitative services "actually delivered through early intervention or school services." The statute itself never names applied behavior analysis. ABA is named in the District’s essential-health-benefit standard: the DC Health Benefit Exchange Authority’s March 22, 2013 resolution defines the habilitative category as services that help a person "keep, learn or improve skills and functioning for daily living, including, but not limited, to applied behavioral analysis (ABA) for the treatment of autism spectrum disorder." CareFirst’s own ASD policy (3.01.015, updated for March 1, 2026) points DC members to § 31-3272 for mandated coverage. Two exclusions matter in Washington especially: the statute’s definition of a health benefit plan excludes "federal employee health plans, pursuant to contracts with the United States government" and Medicare coverage, and self-funded employer plans answer to ERISA rather than District insurance law.[6][7][8][19][17]
The District now licenses behavior analysts, but recently. D.C. Law 25-191 (effective July 19, 2024) gave the Board of Psychology the job of regulating "the practice of behavior analysis" and added a licensed behavior analyst seat to the Board (D.C. Code § 3-1202.11). Under § 3-1207.71 the Board licenses a person who completes a criminal background check, holds "a current certification issued by the Behavior Analyst Certification Board," and has a master’s or higher from a BACB-accredited program, with the education requirement waived for anyone certified by the BACB on or before July 19, 2024. The Mayor was to issue licensure rules (ethics code, education and clinical training, exam, continuing education) within one year. The BACB’s licensure table lists the District (2024, DC Board of Psychology). As of October 2026, though, DC Health’s Board of Psychology page links regulations for psychologists and psychology associates only and shows no behavior-analyst rule or application, so confirm with DC Health whether licenses are being issued before you tell a BCBA they need one. Carriers have not caught up either: CareFirst’s credentialing list still names "Licensed Board-Certified Behavior Analyst (Maryland and Virginia only)" and requires a practitioner to be "licensed in the state where the member receives the service." For telehealth or a BCBA based outside the District, plan on meeting the licensure rule of the place where the child is: DHCF’s telemedicine guidance applies that rule to Medicaid, and ask each commercial plan how it applies it. On rates: commercial ABA rates are negotiated and unpublished. DC Medicaid publishes its ASD fees on the dc-medicaid.com portal, which we could not open.[14][15][16][20][21][22]
Optum’s National Network Manual (effective Sept. 1, 2026) defines the Fee Maximum as "The maximum amount a participating provider may be paid for a specific health care service provided to a member" and says "Reimbursement to clinicians is based upon licensure rather than degree." Its commercial ABA Reimbursement Policy (2022RP501A) puts the credential on every line: HM for an RBT, HN for a BCaBA, HO for a master’s-level BCBA, HP for a doctoral-level provider, with indirect work bundled into the direct codes. For fully insured District plans, D.C. Code § 31-3132 requires payment of clean claims within 30 days (interest after) and at least 180 days to file.[5][4][9]
Optum’s National Network Manual: claims must be received "no more than 90 calendar days from the date of service, or as allowed by state or federal law or the member’s specific benefit plan," and "Any corrections or additions to a claim should be made within 90 days of initial claim receipt." Complete, authorized claims "will be paid within 45 calendar days after Optum receives the claim, or as required by state and federal laws," which may exclude claims that need coordination-of-benefits decisions; the manual sets no separate secondary-claim deadline and publishes no check-run schedule.[5][4][9]
Not for ABA. Optum’s National Network Manual (effective September 1, 2026), which governs UnitedHealthcare behavioral health claims including ABA, lists what a Form 1500 claim should carry: member and subscriber names and dates of birth, member ID, ICD diagnosis, dates of service, length of session, type and duration of service, and the clinician’s name, credentials, tax ID and NPI. A referring provider is not on the list. UnitedHealthcare’s 2026 Administrative Guide asks for a valid billing NPI, rendering NPI and taxonomy on all claims and adds “we encourage you to submit the referring health care provider’s NPI”; it makes the referring provider’s name and NPI mandatory only on “laboratory, DME, imaging and home health claims.”[5][23]
Optum’s ABA Supplemental Clinical Criteria (review 04/2026) set what each continued-service review needs: progress "assessed and documented for each targeted symptom and behavior … including the same modes of measurement that were utilized for baseline measurement"; progress that includes "rate and percentage of mastered programs, rates of mastered targets, change scores for any outcome measures, updated standardized adaptive measures, and change scores for skills-based assessments"; an assessment of the reasons and modified interventions when there is inadequate progress "within a 6-month period"; and an explanation when use of authorized hours falls below 80% over a two-week period. Treatment plans "are usually reviewed/updated twice annually." The criteria do not require graphs.[1]
The questions that decide whether a family can start with UnitedHealthcare / Optum in the District of Columbia, and what they have to bring. Each maps onto something intake should ask on the first call.
No expiry on the diagnosis; the DSM-5 diagnosis and severity level must be confirmed with a validated tool, and progress is reviewed during continued-service review.[1]
A "state licensed physician, psychologist, or other state licensed clinician qualified to make such diagnosis" under DSM-5-TR.[1]
At least one clinically validated tool from a non-exhaustive list: screens (M-CHAT and others), second-level screens (CARS/CARS-2, RITA-T, STAT), and formal tools (ADI-R, ADOS/ADOS-2, DISCO).[1]
No separate physician referral; the SCC require prior authorization. For a fully insured District plan, D.C. Code § 31-3272 sets no referral or treatment-plan requirement of its own; it lets the insurer deliver habilitative coverage "through a managed care system," which § 31-3271 defines as review and preauthorization of the treatment plan. Federal employee plans and self-funded ERISA plans sit outside the statute.[1][7][6]
Optum’s Telehealth Billing guide (September 2025), commercial: "For ABA services, telehealth is only allowed for these 3 CPT codes: 97155, 97156 or 97157," with POS 02 or 10 required. The SCC say telehealth is "not intended to supplant in-person service." Ask Optum how it applies the three-code list to a District-regulated plan. For a District-regulated plan, D.C. Code § 31-3862 says an insurer "may not deny coverage for a healthcare service on the basis that the service is provided through telehealth if the same service would be covered when delivered in person," must reimburse it, and may review telehealth appropriateness only "in the same manner" as in-person care; cost sharing cannot exceed the in-person amount. The statute names no ABA codes, POS or modifiers, and self-funded and federal employee plans are outside it.[3][1][11]
The SCC carry no age criterion; the benefit plan governs. For fully insured District plans, D.C. Code § 31-3272 requires habilitative coverage (autism included) for children under 21, with no dollar or visit cap allowed beyond what applies to other conditions. Federal employee plans and self-funded ERISA plans are outside the statute, so funding type decides whether that binds.[1][7][6]
Ask the plan: Provider Express benefits check: establish fully insured DC, federal employee or self-funded first.
Depends on how the plan is funded. Plans regulated by the District fall under the Prior Authorization Reform Amendment Act of 2023 (D.C. Code ch. 38F). Once it has all required information, a utilization review entity must decide and notify "within … 3 business days of receiving the request via electronic portal or 5 business days of receiving the request via mail, telephone, or facsimile" (24 hours for urgent services), and a request not answered in time "shall be deemed approved." Before an adverse determination it must tell the provider that medical necessity is being questioned and offer a chance to add information. An approval is valid "for at least one year," an approval for a chronic condition stays valid "for as long as medically reasonable and necessary," and it may not be revoked if care is provided within 45 business days. The family gets at least 15 calendar days to appeal. Self-funded employer (ERISA) plans follow 29 CFR 2560.503-1 instead: pre-service decisions "not later than 15 days after receipt of the claim," with one 15-day extension. UnitedHealthcare/Optum publishes no District-specific ABA turnaround or reauthorization lead time.[12][24][25][17]
Ask the plan: At benefits verification ask whether the plan is regulated by the District or self-funded (ERISA), and what reauthorization lead time Optum expects.
For a child on two plans, the order of benefits comes from the plans’ coordination-of-benefits provisions; we did not read a District COB regulation, so ask UnitedHealthcare/Optum which plan is primary. When a child changes plans mid-treatment, D.C. Code § 31-3875.07 makes a District-regulated plan "honor an approval granted by a previous utilization review entity for at least the initial 60 days" of new coverage. If the child also has DC Medicaid, UnitedHealthcare/Optum pays first: Medicaid pays after other coverage (42 CFR 433.139), and DC’s Medicaid plans require the primary’s EOB with the claim. TRICARE pays after this plan (10 U.S.C. 1079(i)(1)); CHAMPVA is the last payer (38 CFR 17.270). If a payer later retracts payment because another carrier was primary, § 31-3133 limits that clawback to 18 months and gives you 180 days to bill the right carrier.[13][10][26][27][28]
Ask the plan: Ask UnitedHealthcare/Optum at benefits verification for the coordination-of-benefits order and record every other coverage the child has.
Coverage decides whether UnitedHealthcare / Optum in the District of Columbia pays. These decide whether the claim survives: how sessions must be staffed and supervised, what may be billed concurrently, the per-day ceilings, who signs the note, where the service is payable, and whose NPI the claim goes out under.
"Consistent with CASP standards of care, direct case supervision is required 1–2 hours for every 10 hours of direct treatment per week." Optum does not recommend parents serving as their own child’s RBT.[1]
No numeric cap; hours must match documented need. Use below 80% of authorized hours over two weeks must be explained at review.[1]
Not covered: services that are not ABA, "such as 1:1 aid delivered simultaneously during classroom instruction," or services covered under IDEA. D.C. Code § 31-3272 likewise excludes habilitative services delivered through early intervention or school.[1][7]
Each claim line carries the rendering credential: HM (RBT), HN (BCaBA), HO (master’s-level BCBA or licensed clinician), HP (doctoral level); indirect services are bundled into direct codes (2022RP501A).[4]
Not addressed in the SCC or the reimbursement policy.[1][4]
Ask the plan: Optum Provider Express support or your participating-provider agreement.
Not addressed in the SCC.[1]
Ask the plan: Optum National Network Manual documentation standards and your participating-provider agreement.
No. Optum’s criteria ask for progress on every target using the baseline measurement method, mastery rates and change scores, updated standardized adaptive measures, and an explanation of low hour use, but they do not require graphs.
90 calendar days from the date of service (or longer where state law or the plan allows), corrections within 90 days of the original claim’s receipt, and payment of complete claims within 45 days or the state’s shorter clock. No check-run schedule is published.
No. Optum’s National Network Manual lists the required claim fields for behavioral health claims without a referring provider, and UnitedHealthcare’s 2026 Administrative Guide only encourages the referring NPI. It is mandatory there only on lab, DME, imaging and home health claims.
Yes, under Optum’s national ABA criteria for ASD. Fully insured DC plans must also cover habilitative services for autism for children under 21 under D.C. Code § 31-3272.
No. Optum’s ABA State Mandates supplement (July 2026) has no District of Columbia entry.
Optum’s commercial telehealth guide allows only 97155, 97156 and 97157, billed POS 02 or 10. DC law bars denying a covered service only because it is delivered by telehealth for District-regulated plans, so ask Optum how it applies the list.
No. DC Medicaid’s plans are AmeriHealth Caritas DC and MedStar Family Choice DC, plus HSCSN for CASSIP.
Payer policies change frequently and vary by plan, state, and funding type. This guide was compiled from the sources above and last reviewed October 2026; it is general information, not billing, legal, or clinical advice. Always verify current requirements against the payer's live policy and a benefits check for the specific member.
Carelu collects all of this automatically.
Every ID, document, and detail this payer requires — gathered conversationally the moment a family reaches out, with insurance verified before your team touches the file.
Get a Demo